Stop Climate Chaos

Bad week for coal topped off by new low-carbon Britain plan

Ed Miliband receives some light reading material

As if using a large fluorescent pen to
highlight the reason why our volunteers were sitting up on top of the Palace of Westminster,
on Monday the Climate Change Committee (CCC) released its first annual report on
the government's progress in meeting its own emissions targets.

Not everything
in the report chimes with what we think is required (there's no room or need
for nuclear power, for instance) but what comes through loud and clear is the
scale of the challenge and the radical action required to meet it. Our climate
is exactly the sort of thing needed to deliver it.

The starkest recommendation is for the UK's energy
sector to be near-zero carbon by 2030. Which, from our point of view, means creating
a lot of renewable energy sources very, very quickly, not to mention improving
efficiency and reducing waste. None of the main political parties have any
policies which come even close to providing this.

The report also has a lot to say about coal,
specifically that it should only have the smallest of roles to play in the UK's energy
portfolio beyond 2020 and emissions from coal power stations should be
practically zero by then.

The committee has come out with this in the
past, but it's another jab in the leg for the coal industry in what's been a
bad week. First a delay
for Kingsnorth
, then earlier this week one of
the investors pulled out
of the proposed new coal power station at
Hunterston in Ayrshire. Now a government committee has reiterated that
emissions from coal must stop within 11 years.

The reason given for the sudden lack of
interest in new coal has been the current economic situation and as many people
have noted, a
recession is an effective way of reducing emissions
. Even the National Grid
suggests that energy
demand could fall by 7.5 per cent
as a result.

However, GDP will eventually start to increase
again, so will the demand for energy, and coal will begin to look attractive
once more. Effective government regulation is the only way to prevent this and
would be provided by our manifesto. As the committee has suggested, regulatory controls
should be put in place to keep emissions going down, such as incentives to
encourage investment in renewable energy, as well as emissions performance
as an option to regulate the energy sector, which would pretty much
rule out unabated coal. With Kingsnorth on hold, Ed Miliband has a golden
opportunity to deal with the threat of coal once and for all.

If the CCC report explains some of the nuts
and bolts of what needs to be done to slash emissions, our own climate
manifesto provides the political and economic blueprint to make it happen.
While there areas where the two diverge, both have one thing in common: they
call for radical action in the very near future.

We know Ed Miliband will have read the CCC
paper; we also know he has a copy of our manifesto (as you can see above, Bob
and Nicola gave it to him). He might not acknowledge any influence we have over
ministerial decisions, but to ignore his own advisory committee would be at
best discourteous, at worst disastrous.

You can help put the pressure on - write to your MP asking them to
back our climate manifesto

Join us on: Twitter Facebook Flickr Actly YouTube FriendFeed